boxkite
Compare · vs. E2B

A container pod you self-host, vs. a MicroVM you don't.

E2B is a polished, hosted-first sandbox built on Firecracker MicroVMs — genuinely strong developer experience and a real, hypervisor-level snapshot feature boxkite can't match. boxkite is the opposite bet: an open-source sandbox you run on your own Kubernetes cluster, so your agents' code and data never leave your infrastructure.

Self-hostableruns entirely on your own cluster
Container podvs. E2B's Firecracker MicroVM
15 toolsbatteries-included, framework-agnostic
0network access by default
The comparison

Feature by feature, without flattering either side

E2B is the market leader in hosted agent sandboxing, and some of its capabilities — memory-state snapshotting, GUI desktops, RL-scale fleets — aren't things boxkite is built to do. This table says so plainly rather than only listing rows where boxkite wins.

boxkiteE2B
Self-hostableYes — your own K8s clusterNo — hosted-first
Isolation primitiveK8s pod — namespaces/cgroups, non-root, dropped capsFirecracker MicroVM — hypervisor-level
Data residencyStays in your own infraRuns on E2B's cloud — see their docs
Pause/resume with live stateNo — filesystem-only, always cold-startsYes — RAM+CPU snapshot, resumes in <1s warm
Framework-agnostic tools15 core tools + opt-in git/Node.js setsCode-interpreter-first SDK, per-provider guides
Model-provider quickstartsOpenAI, Mistral, Groq, Gemini, Vercel AI SDKOpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Groq, Vercel AI SDK
Agent-framework adaptersLangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, OpenAI Agents SDK, Vercel AI SDKLangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, Vercel AI SDK, native OpenAI Agents SDK
MCP integration shapeInbound, OAuth 2.1 — Claude/Cursor drives a boxkite sandboxOutbound — gateway to 200+ third-party MCP tools
Git operationsOpt-in, 8-op tool setFirst-class SDK git methods
Secrets handlingProxy-substitution + opt-in scrubbed env injectionEncrypted org-level secrets, outbound proxy substitution
Long-running processes / PTYBackground start/stop/watch, opt-in real PTYInteractive stream control incl. PTY
Human-facing GUI / Computer UseNo — headless only, by designYes — Desktop VNC/GUI + computer-use agent
RL-scale fleetsNot the design targetPositioned (2026) for large-scale RL training
Vendor lock-inNone — you own the stackHosted dependency
Performance (measured)

E2B wins cold start. That's the honest headline.

E2B's Firecracker microVMs cold-start in <200ms (same region; 80ms secure variant) (e2b.dev) — genuinely faster to first byte than a Kubernetes pod, and we're not going to argue otherwise. boxkite doesn't compete there; it keeps a warm pool so a session is claimable in ~0.9s p50 / ~1.3s p95 and in-sandbox ops land in ~0.4s, both measured against our own API. The reason to pick boxkite isn't speed — it's that all of it runs on your own cluster, MIT-licensed, with no per-second meter running.

Warm session start

~0.9s p50 / ~1.3s p95

p50 877 ms · p95 1289 ms · n=10

In-sandbox exec

~0.4s

p50 419 ms · p95 509 ms · n=12

File operations

~0.4s

create/view/str_replace/grep, all ~0.4s p50 · n=6

boxkite figures measured against our hosted API on 2026-07-21; sample size shown per metric, client-side wall-clock, cluster warm and image cached. E2B's <200ms (same region; 80ms secure variant) is its own published cold-start claim under its own methodology, not a head-to-head reproduction. Methodology: /blog/measuring-session-start-latency.

The two products optimize for different constraints — E2B for hosted convenience and MicroVM-grade session continuity, boxkite for owning the whole stack.

When boxkite is the right call

Reach for E2B when you want zero operational surface, near-instant warm resume, or GUI/Computer-Use workloads, and you're fine with agent code running on E2B's infrastructure. Reach for boxkite when compliance, data residency, or already-running Kubernetes means the sandbox has to live inside your own cluster — and you still want a batteries-included bash/python/file/process tool surface on day one.

Already sold?

Two ways to run boxkite — same code

Both paths run identical control-plane/ code — pick the operational model that fits.

Self-host

The OSS repo, your cluster

docker compose for kicking the tires, or real Kubernetes for production — full control over the isolation model, data never leaves your cluster.

Clone the repo on GitHub

Hosted API

The beta control-plane

Try boxkite without standing up Kubernetes yourself — fair-use free tier, 20 sandbox-hours/month, 2 concurrent sandboxes, no billing yet.

Create a free account →